SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1396

DEEPAK VERMA, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
High Court of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Udaya Holla, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Permission to file SLP is hereby granted.

2. This petition has been preferred by the High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore primarily against various interim orders passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in TRC Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 of 2005 on different dates. We have critically gone through the said interim - orders passed on different dates by the Division Bench. Vide the impugned orders, several queries and details are being sought for by it, which, in our considered opinion, prima facie do not appear to be relevant and germane to the facts of the main matter which is being heard by the Division Bench.

3. The Division Bench is in the midst of hearing of an appeal preferred by Commissioner of Customs against respondent No. 1 filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act. Impugned orders reveal that apart from hearing the matter, several interim orders are passed calling upon the Registrar General and Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court to furnish many details with which the Bench may not be concerned for effective adjudication of the matter on merits.

4. We have been given to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top