SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 749

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, K. M. Joseph, JJ.
Vikrant Singh Malik and Others - Appellants
Versus
Supertech Limited and Others - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3526 of 2016
Decided On : 24-08-2020

Headnote:

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 12(1)(c) - Residential project - Occupancy/completion certificate - Possession - Complaint before NCDRC was instituted by twenty-six flat buyers, who had booked flats in a residential project (named ‘Oxford Square’) of first respondent at Sector - Direct Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw its offer of possession which has been made in absence of a valid Occupancy Certificate/Completion Certificate and to offer possession after obtaining a proper occupancy/completion certificate within a fixed time - Withdraw demand raised and refund if already paid, money which has been demanded/collected in name of sale of open as well as covered car parking charges as no covered car parking has been created/built by Opposite Party No.1 in said project and sale of open car parking slots are illegal, for each of complainants, as per claim sheet - Whether application that was filed on behalf of appellants fulfils requirements of Section 12(1)(c) - Held, Court are of view that bearing in mind object and purpose of Act, it would be appropriate if NCDRC reconsiders its decision to dismiss complaint in its entirety by considering as to whether some or all prayers which were urged before it in complaint would fall within description of a sameness of interest - NCDRC is at liberty to consider the objection raised by first respondent on ground that some of reliefs in complaint before it were also the subject of the writ proceedings before Allahabad High Court – Court may also note at this stage that Mr Madiyal appearing for the appellants had sought liberty of this Court to move an application before NCDRC for amendment of complaint and to plead essential requirements of Section 12(1)(c) – Court need not consider a request of an anticipatory nature of this kind at present stage since no such application has been made - This will not preclude appellants from adopting such remedies as are available within parameters of law - Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.

1. This appeal arises from a judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 dated 19 February 2016. Declining permission to the complainants to file a composite complaint under the provisions of Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“Act”), the NCDRC dismissed the consumer complaint (Consumer Complaint No. 1290 of 2015) which was filed before it by twenty-six flat buyers, on the ground that:

    “13. …there is nothing common between the aforesaid complainants, so no permission can be granted to the above complainants to file one complaint in view of Section 12(1)(c) of the Act.”

However, the complainants were granted the liberty to institute individual complaints before the appropriate forum.

2. The complaint before the NCDRC was instituted by twenty-six flat buyers, who had booked flats in a residential project (named ‘Oxford Square’) of the first respondent at Sector GH-06, 16B, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (also known as “Noida Extension”). The following reliefs were sought in the complaint:

    "a) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw its offer of possession which has been made in absence of a valid Occupancy Certificate/Completion Certificate and to offer the possession after obtaining a proper occupancy/completion certificate within a fixed time;

    (b) Withdraw demand raised and refund if already paid, money which has been demanded/collected in the name of sale of open as well as covered car parking charges as no covered car parking has been created/built by the Opposite Party No.1 in the said project and the sale of open car parking slots are illegal, for each of the complainants, as per the claim sheet;

    (c) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to charge/refund money under various heads as per the actual super area declared under the sanctioned building plans by Opposite Party No.1 to the appropriate authorities;

    (d) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw cost escalation charges as captured in the demands raised with the Offer of Possession letters of various complainants;

    (e) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw demand raised under the head "Farmer's compensation charges";

    (f) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw/refund any demand raised/collected in the name of club charges as no club has been constructed in this society, individually for all the complainants as per the claim sheet;

    (g) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw the interest levied on all the complainants now at the stage of final payments while making an offer of possession;

    (h) Direct Opposite Party No.2 to cancel/withdraw the licence granted to the Opposite Party No.1 and takeover the project and further complete the said project and handover the possession of the flats/floors to the complainants;

    (i) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw the demand raised in the name of Labour Welfare charges from all the complainants;

    (j) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw the demand raised in the name of water connection charges and further not to take any undertaking for levy of any charges under this head at a later date;

    (k) Direct Opposite Party No.1 to withdraw the demand on account of EDC charges/refund the amount collected in the name of EDC charges as no such charges have been levied by the appropriate authorities;

    (l) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to charge and collect maintenance charges from all the complainants only upon delivery of possession of their respective flats with proper occupancy certificate(s) in place and after execution of a maintenance agreement in this regard;

    (m) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to pay delayed possession penalty on a monthly basis with effect from the date the possession was to be delivered individually to all the complainants, till such time the possession is actually delivered to the complainants with proper occupancy certificate(s) in place;

    (n) Direct the Opposite Party No.1 to pay a Compensation of Rs.4,00,30,070/- (Rupees Four C

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top