Nitaben Dinesh Patel vs Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 593

M.R.SHAH, A.S.BOPANNA
Nitaben Dinesh Patel – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Mihir Thakore, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv. Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, Adv. Mr. Jaimin Dave, Adv. Ms. Vishakha, Adv. Ms. Prema Mohapatra, Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 27.09.2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in SCA No. 11379/2018 and SCA No. 16101/2018, by which the High Court has dismissed writ petition being SCA No. 11379/2018 and has allowed SCA No. 16101/2018 and has quashed and set aside the order passed by the learned Family Court dated 8.5.2018 passed below the application (Exhibit 281) in Family Suit No. 862/2007, the original writ petitioner in SCA No. 11379/2018 and the original respondent in SCA No. 16101/2018 has preferred the present appeals.

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in nutshell are as under :

The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 1.3.1987 according to the Hindu rites. Out of the said wedlock, they had a child, named as ‘Devashya’ on 3.5.1990. The appellant was also a doctor, but it was the case on behalf of the appellant that after the birth of the child she stopped practising as a doctor and remained housewife. The dispute arose between the husband an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 593

M.R.SHAH, A.S.BOPANNANitaben Dinesh Patel – AppellantVersusDinesh Dahyabhai Patel – Respondent

Cases Referred (9)

M.R.SHAH, A.S.BOPANNA
Nitaben Dinesh Patel – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel – Respondent