SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 707

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)
M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.
Anil Kumar Soti & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. through Collector Bijnore (U.P.) - Respondent
Civil Appeal No.6919 of 2021
Decided On : 23-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Piyush Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Sakha Ram Singh Yadav, Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Ashiwan Mishra, Anurag Tiwari, Kamlendra Mishra, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
While determining market value/compensation, previous instances of acquisition in proximity for location and potential of land acquisition along with cumulative increase is relevant consideration.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 4 – Acquisition of land – Compensation – Determination of market value of land – While determining market value/compensation, previous instances of acquisition in proximity for location and potential of land acquisition along with cumulative increase is relevant consideration – In present case, time gap between two notifications under Section 4 of Act is only seven months – Judgment and award passed by Reference Court in that case determining market value/compensation at Rs.15,402/- per acre has attained finality and the State has accepted the same by withdrawing appeal against said judgment and award – In present circumstances, appellants shall be entitled to compensation at Rs.15,402/- per acre – Impugned judgment and order passed by High Court modified – Appellants shall be entitled to compensation for land acquired at Rs.15,402/- per acre with all other statutory benefits which may be available under the Act subject to payment of deficient Court fees. (Paras 7 and 8)

Facts of the case:

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 16.04.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in First Appeal No.440 of 1989, by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the appellants herein – original claimants and has determined the market value of the lands acquired at Rs.7,100/- per acre only, original land owners have preferred the present appeal.

Findings of Court:

Nothing has been pointed out with respect to any material changes for period between 16.05.1981 and 16.12.1981 time gap between the two notifications under Section 4 of the Act. On the contrary, after the judgment and award passed by Reference Court with respect to the land acquired of same village for which notification under Section 4 was issued on 19.12.1981, Reference Court determined the compensation at Rs.15,402/- per acre. The Reference Court in that case relied upon the sale deed exemplar of 1978.

Result : Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT :

M. R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 16.04.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in First Appeal No.440 of 1989, by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the appellants herein – original claimants and has determined the market value of the lands acquired at Rs.7,100/- per acre only, original land owners have preferred the present appeal.

2. That the appellants’ lands situated at village Rawali came to be acquired for public purpose. A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was issued on 16.05.1981. The Land Acquisition Officer declared the award and determined the compensation at Rs.5,218.39/ per acre. At the instances of the claimants a Reference was made to the District Court under Section 18 of the ACT claiming compensation of Rs.12,000/- per acre. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation from Rs.5,218.39/- per acre to Rs.6,696.70/- per acre with all other statutory benefits which may be available under the Act. The appellants herein preferred the appeal before the High Court. The claimants prayed the compensation of Rs.15,402/- per acre relying upon the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court in another case with respect to the acquisition of the land of the very village, but with respect to the notification issued under Section 4 of the Act dated 19.12.1981. That by the impugned judgment and order and relying upon and considering the sale deed exemplar dated 23.12.1980, the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal and has determined and awarded the compensation at the rate of Rs.7,100/- per acre.

3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, enhancing the amount of compensation to Rs.7,100/- per acre only the original claimants have preferred the present appeal.

4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants – original claimants has vehemently submitted that the High Court has materially erred in determining and awarding the compensation of Rs.7,100/- per acre only.

4.1 It is submitted that for the acquisition of the land of the very village but notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 19.12.1981 the Reference Court determined and awarded the compensation at Rs.15,402/- per acre. It is submitted that the Reference Court in that case relied upon the sale deed exemplar of the year 1978 and thereafter determined the market value of the compensation at Rs. 15,402/- per acre. It is submitted that the appeal against the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court in that case determining and awarding the compensation at Rs.15,402/per acre has been subsequently withdrawn. It is submitted that therefore the Government has accepted the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court with respect to the land acquired of the same village but for which the notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 19.12.1981. It is submitted that therefore the appellants are also entitled to the compensation of Rs.15,402/ per acre.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has submitted that in the present case the High Court has rightly determined the compensation at Rs.7,100/- per acre considering the sale deed exemplar dated 23.12.1980 which as such can be said to be proximate/nearer to the date of the acquisition of the land. It is submitted that therefore the interference of this court in exercise of power under Article 136 of the Constitution of India is not called for.

6. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties at length.

7. At the outset, it is required to be noted and it is not in dispute that in the present case notification under Section 4 of the Act has been issued on 16.05.1981 by which the High Court has determined the compensation at Rs.7,100/per acre. However, it is required to be noted that with res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top