M. R. SHAH, KRISHNA MURARI
State through the Inspector of Police – Appellant
Versus
Laly @ Manikandan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. SHAH, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 12.06.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, at Madurai in Criminal Appeal Nos. 270/2017 and 362/2017, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeals by acquitting the respondents-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 302 r/w 34 IPC, the State has preferred the present appeals.
2. That the respondents herein-original accused were tried for the aforesaid offences for having killed/committed the murder of deceased Saravanan. It was the prosecution case that owing to animosity between the friend of the accused viz. Selvakumar and one Periyavan @ Murugan, there was a murder of Selvakumar on 31.07.2013. Suspecting that the deceased Saravanan had informed the whereabouts of Selvakumar, the accused, on a two-wheeler armed with weapons obstructed the car in which the deceased, PW-1 and one another were travelling and dashed the car and broke the wind screen of the car with aruvals. A1 caused the injury on the right shoulder of the deceased. The deceased Saravanan tried to run away, however, the accused chased him and thereafter all the accused ca
(1) Recovery of weapon used in commission of offence is not a sine qua non to convict accused – If there is direct evidence in form of eye witness, even in absence of recovery of weapon, accused can ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that conviction cannot be based solely on unreliable witness testimony, and previous enmity can be a ground for false implication. Additionally, la....
(1) Evidence of an injured witness has greater evidentiary value.(2) Merely because witnesses were relatives of deceased, their evidence cannot be discarded solely on the ground that they were plante....
(1) Appeal against acquittal – If appellate court comes to conclusion that findings recorded by trial court are erroneous and contrary to law, it is always open for appellate court, by recording good....
(1) If a decision is arrived at on the basis of no evidence or thoroughly unreliable evidence and no reasonable person would act upon it, order would be perverse.(2) When there is a direct evidence i....
(1) A mere message or a telephonic message which does not clearly specify offence, cannot be treated as FIR.(2) What constitutes proof of common intention, may differ from situation to situation.
The reliability of an injured eye-witness testimony and its corroboration by medical evidence are crucial in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
(1) Minor discrepancies should not be given undue importance that don’t go to root of matter. Such contradictions are not material contradictions and evidence of such witnesses cannot be brushed asid....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.