SURYA KANT, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Desh Raj – Appellant
Versus
Rohtash Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surya Kant, J.
1. Leave Granted.
2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.05.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby a second appeal preferred by the Appellants was dismissed and judgment and decree of the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court were affirmed. The decree entitled the Respondent for the recovery of earnest money, which constituted of partly paid sale consideration in lieu of the concerned agreements to sale along with requisite interest. The factual matrix is succinctly discussed before delving into the issue of law regarding breach of contractual terms which requires adjudication before us.
A. FACTS
3. The subject matter of the original suit was a property measuring 23 Kanals 4 Marlas bearing Khewat No. 226, Khatoni No. 225, Rect. No. 27, Kila No 3 min (29), 4 min (415), 7(80), 14(40) situated in the revenue estate of Village Tigra, Tehsil and District Gurgaon (hereinafter, ‘Concerned Property’) which the Appellants jointly owned to the extent of their respective shares.
4. Two separate agreements to sell were entered between the present parties for the Concerned Property on 17.02.2004 (hereinafter, ‘Sale Agr
Satish Batra v Sudhir Rawal (2013) 1 SCC 345 – Relied [Para 17]
Fateh Chand v Balkishan Dass (1964) 1 SCR 515 – Relied [Para 18]
Citadel Fine Pharmaceuticals v Ramaniyam Real Estates Private Ltd (2011) 9 SCC 147
Saradamani Kandappan v S. Rajalakshmi (2011) 12 SCC 18 – Relied [Para 23]
Kailash Nath Associates v DDA (2015) 4 SCC 136
ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705 – Relied [Para 35]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.