SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. SHAH, KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.
B. Venkateswaran & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
P. Bakthavatchalam – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1555 of 2022 (@ SLP (Crl.) No. 3411/2021)
Decided On : 05-01-2023
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Alleged interference with right of enjoyment on property – Quashing petition – Private civil dispute between parties is converted into criminal proceedings – Initiation of criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is nothing but abuse of process of law and Court – No case for offences under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is made out, even prima facie – None of ingredients of Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 are made out and/ or satisfied – Impugned judgment and order passed by High Court dismissing writ petition quashed and set aside – Criminal proceedings initiated against appellants by respondent herein-original complainant for offence under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 including summons issued by Special Court in a private complaint filed by respondent quashed and set aside. (Paras 3 and 4)
Facts of the case:
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of judicature at Madras in Criminal (OP) No.33505 of 2019, by which, the High Court has dismissed petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure and has refused to quash the criminal proceedings initiated by the private respondent herein, initiated against petitioners for the offence under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, accused have preferred present appeal.
Findings of Court:
Impugned judgment and order passed by High Court is unsustainable and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside and the criminal proceedings initiated against appellants deserves to be quashed and set aside.
Result : Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
M.R. Shah, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of judicature at Madras in Criminal (OP) No.33505 of 2019, by which, the High Court has dismissed the said petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and has refused to quash the criminal proceedings initiated by the private respondent herein, initiated against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the accused have preferred present appeal.
2. That the private respondent herein has filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai for alleged offence under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 alleging inter alia that the petitioners herein – original accused have conspired and unlawfully encroached the pathway adjacent to his house and started to construct temple. It was alleged that the said temple was built up on the complainant water pipeline, Sewage Pipeline and EB cable and thereby caused obstructions to him to enjoy his property. Therefore, it was alleged that even after order passed by the High Court, the accused persons did not stop the illegal construction and thereby committed atrocities on the peaceful living of his family. It was further alleged that the accused persons prevented the complainant from putting up further construction on his building and also criminally intimidated. That the Special Court after receipt of the complaint, recorded the sworn statement of the complainant under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also examined the witnesses under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure who were produced by the complainant and thereafter took cognizance of the case under Sections 3(1)(v) and (va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and issued summons to the accused persons. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the summons issued by the learned Special Court, the accused persons filed the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the High Court to quash the criminal proceedings against them. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the said application and has refused to quash the criminal proceedings. Hence, present appeal at the instance of the original accused.
3. We have heard Shri Nagamuthu, learned senior counsel for the appellants – original accused and the respondent appearing in person. We have also gone through the complaint and considered the allegations in the complaint made against the accused. Having considered the allegations in the complaint and the material on record, it appears that initiation of the criminal proceedings by the respondent against the appellants – original accused for the offence under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is nothing but an abuse of process of law and the court and also provision of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It appears that a private dispute was going on between the parties with respect to the illegal construction. As per the allegations in the complaint, the original complainant had purchased the vacant land and constructed the building. It is alleged that adjacent to his house and on the common pathway, the accused have unlawfully encroached upon the pathway and started constructing the temple and thereby have put up illegal construction on his water pipeline, sewage pipeline and EB Cable. In the entire complaint, there are no allegations that the complainant is obstructed and/or interfered with enjoyment of his right on his property deliberately and willfully knowing that complainant belongs to SC/ST. From t
Civil dispute between parties cannot be converted into criminal proceedings.
The court ruled that allegations under the SC/ST Act must demonstrate intent to humiliate based on caste, and the second proviso of Section 14-A(3) was struck down as unconstitutional.
The judgment establishes the principle that when appeal is specifically provided for in a particular act against orders other than interlocutory, the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot b....
Disputed facts should be decided in trial, and criminal complaints cannot be quashed solely on the ground that the allegations are civil in nature.
Criminal proceedings under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act cannot arise from a private civil dispute without sufficient evidence of caste-based intent in the ....
(1) Offence under SC/ST Act, 1989 can be quashed on the ground of compromise between parties.(2) Powers of Apex Court under Article 142 can be invoked to quash a criminal proceeding on the basis of a....
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Article 142 if the allegations do not constitute an offence and are primarily private in nature, especially in cases involving caste-based claims.
The court quashed proceedings against petitioners as allegations did not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the need for prima facie grounds for prosecution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the essential ingredients of the offences under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, including intentional....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.