MAHDOOM BAVA vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 246

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
MAHDOOM BAVA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv., Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv., Mr. Akash, Adv., Mr. Naman Raj Singh, Adv., Mr. Akash Chaudhary, Adv., Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv., Mr. Subham Saxena, Adv., Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Anshuman Sinha, Adv., Mr. Vijay Kumar Pandey, Adv., Mr. Vinay Prakash, Adv., Mr. Niteen Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Udayan Sinha, Adv., Mr. Hemant Mour, Adv., Mr. Vivek Sharma, AOR Mr. Sidharth Khattar, Adv., Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Akash Jain, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

JUDGMENT :

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. Accused Nos. 2, 3, 10 and 14 in FIR No. RC 219 2019 E0006, investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation¹[For short, “CBI”], have come up with the above appeals challenging the orders of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad rejecting their applications for the grant of anticipatory bail.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and Shri Vikramjeet Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the respondent-CBI.

4. The First Information Report²[For short, “FIR”] in this case was registered on 29.06.2019 at the instance of the Corporation Bank, for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120B IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The gravamen of the allegations contained in the FIR was, that a Company by name M/s Nafto Gaz India Pvt. Ltd., secured certain credit facilities from a consortium of banks led by the State Bank of India; that the facilities were secured by the creation of a charge on movable properties and a mortgage of certain immovable properties; that the account of the said Company was operated prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 246

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHALMAHDOOM BAVA – AppellantVersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
MAHDOOM BAVA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent