SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 584

K. M. JOSEPH, B. V. NAGARATHNA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Coal India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Competition Commission of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Ajay Nandalike, Adv. Mr. Achyuth Ajithkumar, Adv. Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. Mohd Shaz Khan, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Adnan Yousuf, Adv. Mrs. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. Harman Sandhu, Adv. Ms. Shally Bhasin, Adv. Mr. Yaman Verma, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya Safaya, Adv. Mr. Prateek Gupta, Adv. Ms. Raveena Lalit, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Hazari, Adv. Ms. Sanjana L.b., Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sakya Singha Chaudhuri, AOR Mr. N. Venkataraman, ASG. Mr. Rishad Ahmed Chowdhury, AOR Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR Mr. Matrugupta Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ritika Singhal, Adv. Ms. Ishita Thakur, Adv. Ms. Divya Roy, AOR Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, AOR Mr. M. A. Venkata Subramanian, Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sheena Taqvi, Adv. Ms. Akansha Saini, Adv. Mrs. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. Nagarkatti Kartik Uday, AOR Mr. G. Saikumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Malik, Adv. Ms. Nikita Choukse, Adv. Mr. Akash Lamba, Adv. Ms. Ekssha, Adv. M/S. D.S.K. Legal, AOR

Table of Content
1. civil appeal against cci's findings on monopoly. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding applicability of competition act. (Para 5 , 6)
3. appellants argue nationalization act protects them. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. potential conflicts between competition act and nationalization act. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. respondents argue competition act applies to state monopolies. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. constitutional basis of state monopolies and obligations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. judicial review and alternative grievance mechanisms available. (Para 23 , 24)
8. court's findings on the application of laws in the case. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
9. compatibility of various legal frameworks governing monopolies. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
10. conclusion on the effectiveness of existing laws. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
11. final observations on maintaining competitive integrity. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT :

K.M. Joseph, J.

1. The Civil Appeal is directed against the Order passed by the Competition Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’), by which Order, the Tribunal affirmed the findings and conclusion recorded by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referr


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top