B. V. NAGARATHNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Rohit Bishnoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nagarathna, J.
Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. These appeals have been preferred by the informant-appellant assailing the judgments dated 14 February, 2022 and 02 February, 2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 16016 of 2021, 4265 of 2022 and 4823 of 2022, whereby, bail has been granted to the respondents-accused herein, namely, Vikas Vishnoi, Budharam and Rajendra Bishnoi respectively, in connection with First Information Report (“F.I.R.” for short) No. 134 of 2020 registered at Police Station Mandore, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC” for the sake of brevity) and Section 3 read with Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
4. The facts in a nutshell are that the appellant is the brother of one of the deceased, namely, Vikash Panwar and is the informant who lodged F.I.R. No. 134 of 2020 against four persons, including three of the respondents-accused herein.
4.1. F.I.R. No. 134 of 2020 dated 18 May, 2020 is stated to have been filed by the appellant herein between 2.4
Deepak Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs. NCT, Delhi
Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs. Ashis Chaterjee
Ramesh Bhavan Rathod vs. Vishanbhai Hirabhai Makwana (Koli)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.