BELA M. TRIVEDI, DIPANKAR DATTA
P. Kishore Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vittal K. Patkar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
THE APPEAL
1. This civil appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 29th November, 2010 rendered by the Karnataka High Court, whereby an appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”, hereafter) was allowed, resulting in restoration of the decree passed by the Trial Court and setting aside of the first appellate decree dismissing the suit of the plaintiff – respondent (“plaintiff”, hereafter).
BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS
2. The factual matrix of the case, insofar as is relevant for the purpose of a decision on this appeal, is set out hereinbelow:
i) The pleaded case in the plaint is that land comprised in Sy. No. 3, measuring 187 acres 38 guntas, in Navarathna Agrahara, Hobli, Devanhalli Taluk, Bangalore, devolved upon the plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest, K. Muniyappa @ K. Shamaiah vide a Family Settlement Deed dated 30th July, 1953.
ii) 15 acres out of the said land was sold by K. Shamaiah to the vendor of the plaintiff, i.e., Smt. Akula Yogamba (“plaintiff’s vendor” hereafter) vide registered sale deed dated 14th February, 1958.
iii) The Mysore
Sawarni vs. Inder Kaur and Ors.
Balwant Singh & Ors vs. Daulat Singh (Dead) by LRs and Ors.
Sita Ram Bhau Patil vs. Ramchandra Nago Patil (Dead) by LRs. and Ors.
Union of India and Ors. vs. Vasavi Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Ors.
Jagdish Prasad Patel (Dead) thr. LRs. and Ors. vs. Shivnath and Ors.
R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.