ABHAY S. OKA, PANKAJ MITHAL
Vishwakalyan Multistate Credit Co Op Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Oneup Entertainment Private Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Despite service, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent.
3. The appellant is the complainant in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short "the NI Act"). On 26th June, 2021, the Judicial Magistrate issued process on the complaint. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has held that as the respondent was having its office outside the jurisdiction of the Court of the learned Magistrate, it was necessary for the learned Magistrate to hold an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the CRPC"). In paragraph 15 of the impugned judgment, the High Court held that for non-compliance with the mandate of Section 202 of the CRPC, the order issuing process is illegal. Therefore, the High Court has proceeded to set aside the order issuing process. However, no further direction was issued by the High Court to the learned Judicial Magistrate to hold an inquiry under Section 202 of the CRPC.
4. We may note here that as far as complaints under Section 138 of the NI Act are concerned, this Court in Suo Motu Writ Petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.