SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. Nagarathna, Augustine George Masih, JJ.
Dolly Rani - Petitioner
Versus
Manish Kumar Chanchal - Respondent
Transfer Petition (C) No(s). 2043 of 2023
Decided On : 19-04-2024
(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Sections 7 and 8 – [Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017] – Hindu marriage – Unless and until marriage is performed with appropriate ceremonies and in due form, it cannot be said to be solemnised – Requisite ceremonies for solemnisation of Hindu marriage must be in accordance with applicable customs or usage and where Saptapadi has been adopted, marriage becomes complete and binding when seventh step is taken – Where a Hindu marriage is not performed in accordance with applicable rites or ceremonies such as Saptapadi when included, marriage will not be construed as a Hindu marriage – Unless parties have undergone such ceremony, there would be no Hindu marriage according to Section 7 of the Act and a mere issuance of a certificate by an entity in absence of requisite ceremonies having been performed, would neither confirm any marital status to parties nor establish a marriage under Hindu law – Certificate issued by Vadik Jankalyan Samiti (Regd.) in absence of any indication as to rites and customs that were performed and as to whether requirements under Section 7 of Act was complied with would not be a certificate evidencing a Hindu marriage in accordance with Section 7 of Act – In absence of any ceremony being performed such a certificate could not have been issued – advantage of registration is that it facilitates proof of factum of marriage in a disputed case – But if there has been no marriage in accordance with Section 7, registration would not confer legitimacy to marriage – Certificate of marriage is a proof of validity of Hindu marriage only when such a marriage has taken place and not in a case where there is no marriage ceremony performed at all. (Paras 15, 16 and 17)
(B) Hindu Law – Hindu marriage – Hindu marriage is a sacrament and has a sacred character – A wife is considered to be half of oneself (Ardhangini) but to be accepted with an identity of her own and to be a co-equal partner in marriage – There is nothing like a “better-half” in a marriage but spouses are equal halves in a marriage – In Hindu Law, marriage is a sacrament or a Samskara – It is foundation for a new family – With passage of centuries and enactment of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, monogamy is only legally approved form of relationship between a husband and a wife – The Act encompasses not only Hindus as such but Lingayats, Brahmos, Aryasamajists, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs also who can enter into a valid Hindu marriage coming within expansive connotation of word Hindu – Children born out of a valid Hindu marriage are legitimate and they have full rights in law – Marriage is not an event for ‘song and dance’ and ‘wining and dining’ or an occasion to demand and exchange dowry and gifts by undue pressure leading to possible initiation of criminal proceedings thereafter – A marriage is not a commercial transaction – It is a solemn foundational event celebrated so as to establish a relationship between a man and a woman who acquire status of a husband and wife for an evolving family in future which is a basic unit of Indian society – Critical conditions for solemnizing of a Hindu marriage should be assiduously, strictly and religiously followed – In instant case, petitioner and respondent were not married in accordance with provisions of Act and they have never acquired status of husband and wife – Cases filed by parties against each other stand quashed. (Paras 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23)
(C) Special Marriage Act, 1954 – Section 5 – Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 7 – Valid marriage – Under Special Marriage Act, 1954, a man and a woman can acquire status of being a husband and a wife as per provisions of said Act – Special Marriage Act, 1954 is not restricted to Hindus – Any man and woman irrespective of their race, caste or creed can acquire status of being a husband and a wife under provisions of Special Marriage Act, 1954 but under provisions of Act (Hindu Marriage Act, 1955), there should not only be compliance of conditions as prescribed under Section 5 of said Act but also couple must solemnise a marriage in accordance with Section 7 of Act. (Para 22)
Facts of the case:
Present transfer petition is filed under Section 25 of CPC by petitioner-wife seeking transfer of divorce petition under Section 13(l)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 pending before Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, Bihar to Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi, Jharkhand.
Findings of Court:
Application filed under Article 142 of Constitution is allowed.
Result : Transfer Petition disposed of.
No legal document was provided in your query (the {content} placeholder appears to be empty or undefined). Please provide the full
ORDER :
1. The present transfer petition is filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “CPC”) by the petitioner-wife seeking the following reliefs:
b. Pass such other and further orders and/ or directions as 1s deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. During the pendency of this petition the parties have decided to resolve that dispute by filing a joint application under Article 142 of the Constitution of India seeking certain reliefs as referred to later.
3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner and the respondent are trained commercial pilots. The parties were engaged to be married on 07.03.2021. The petitioner and respondent claimed to have ‘solemnized’ their marriage on 07.07.2021. They obtained a “marriage certificate” from Vadik Jankalyan Samiti (Regd.). Based on this certificate, they obtained a “Certificate of Registration of Marriage” under the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017. The respective families of the parties fixed the date for performing the marriage ceremony as per Hindu rites and customs on 25.10.2022. Meanwhile, the petitioner and respondent lived separately but nevertheless, differences ignited between them. According to the petitioner, there was demand for dowry made by respondent’s family.
4. On 17.11.2022, the petitioner filed an FIR under Sections 498A, 420, 506, 509, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”) and Sections 3,4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short, “DP Act”) against the respondent and his family members alleging harassment.
5. Thereafter on 13.03.2023, the respondent approached the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, Bihar by filing a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act in Matrimonial Case No.82/2023. Being aggrieved by this fact as the petitioner-wife is currently residing in Ranchi, Jharkhand with her parents, she filed the present transfer petition seeking to transfer the divorce petition under Section 13(l)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) bearing Matrimonial Case No. 82/2023 titled "Manish Kumar v/s Doly Singh" pending before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, Bihar to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi Jharkhand.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent has filed a Matrimonial Case No.82/2023 under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act seeking a decree of divorce as against the petitioner herein whereas there being no marriage between the parties in the eyes of the law, the respondent could not have sought for by the said decree.
7. Learned counsel for the respondent also submitted that indeed there was no marriage in accordance with Section 7 of the Act inasmuch as the requisites of a valid Hindu marriage insofar as ceremonies are concerned, were not complied with but having no other recourse, the respondent was constrained to file M.C. No.82/2023 as the “marriage” between the parties was registered before the Registrar of Marriages.
8. Learned counsel for the respective parties further submitted that during the pendency of this transfer petition, the parties have discussed the matter and they have agreed to file a joint application under Article 142 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:
(ii) Consequently, grant a decree of declaration that the certificate dated 07.07.2021 issued by under the Utt
Hindu marriage – Unless and until marriage is performed with appropriate ceremonies and in due form, it cannot be said to be solemnised – Certificate of marriage is a proof of validity of Hindu marri....
Restitution of conjugal rights – Where marriage itself is not proved, decree for restitution of conjugal rights cannot be sustained.
Marriage under Hindu law requires performance of essential ceremonies; mere documentation is insufficient to establish valid marital status.
Denial of registration of marriage of a foreign national amounts to violation of Right to Equality (Article-14). The respondents cannot refuse to register the marriage of the petitioners only on the ....
A continuous cohabitation raises a presumption of marriage; the disputing party carries the burden of proof to establish otherwise.
The second marriage performed during the subsistence of the first marriage is void under Section 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Point of Law : The only condition for registration of marriage as per Rule 6 of Rules, 2008 is that marriage is to be solemnized.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.