SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 369

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, G.BIKSHAPATHY
Charan Singh – Appellant
Versus
G. Vittal Reddy – Respondent


G. BISKHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) ALL these appeals were filed by the workmen against the orders passed by the learned single Judge in the appeals filed against the orders of the Commissioner for Workmen s compensation. Since common question of law is involved in all these Appeals, they are disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) IN a lorry accident that took place, several workmen including the crew of the lorry sustained injuries. Since the accident had taken place out of and in the course of employment of the workmen, claims were laid before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, nizamabad, who was designated as the commissioner for Workmen s Compensation under the provisions of the Workmen s compensation Act, 1923. Evidence was adduced by the workmen concerned. Not only the workmen were examined but the doctor who had issued Disability Certificate was also examined. The learned Commissioner relying on the evidence of the workmen and also the medical evidence coupled with the certificate of disability, allowed the claims fixing various percentages of disability depending on the nature of injuries sustained by them.

( 3 ) AGAINST those orders of Commissioner for Workmen s Compensation, the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top