SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 257

B.S.A.SWAMY
T. S. Devakaranamma and another – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE subject-matter of these Writ Petitions being the same, they can be disposed of by a Common Order.

( 2 ) THE first Writ Petition i. e. W. P. No. 16179/99 is filed questioning the Notice No. 10, dt. 16-6-1999 and endorsement G8/13299/99, dt. 21-6-1999 wherein the request of the petitioners for construction of a pucca building in an extent of 1020 sq. yards in Sy. No. 97/2 in premises bearing No. 2-9-456 of Vaddepally village, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District was negatived on the ground that the proposed construction is affecting the Master Plan of the year 1971 wherein a road was proposed to be laid over the land in question. It is further stated in the above notice that the unauthorised constructions that are proposed to be made by the petitioners affecting the Master Plan will be viewed seriously and the required proceedings under law will be initiated for prevention and removal of structure (not covered under the decree) which will affect the Master Plan. It is the contention of the petitioners that the respondents cannot high-handedly take possession of their land without following the due procedure of law i. e. , putting the provisions of Land Acq














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top