SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 488

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Chirapareddi Veeramma – Appellant
Versus
Mahaboob Subhani – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are the plaintiffs in O. S. No. 623/90. The suit was one for grant of permanent injunction in respect of certain agricultural lands and for restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs possession. Pending suit the petitioners filed IA. No. 849/90 for grant of temporary injunction. The defendants-respondents filed a counter stating that the plaintiffs are not in possession and that they (defendants) are in possession. After mentioning the facts of the case and the previous litigation between the parties, the learned District Munsif stated that it may not be good for the court to give a finding as to whether the plaintiffs or defendants are in possession and that therefore it would be better to direct maintenance of the status quo That order was passed on 16-10-1990. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed I. A. No. 1077/90 for grant of police aid and directions to the Station House Officer, Chebrole to see that the orders in IA. No. 849/90 are implemented. They contended that they had raised the standing crop. The respondents defendants filed a counter contending that the plaintiffs did not raise the crop and that it was the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top