A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Deputy Director of Agriculture, Khamman – Appellant
Versus
Sarvadevabhatla Ramanadham – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these S. R. Nos. , the question that falls for consideration is whether the appeal preferred by the appellants under S. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act is maintainable. The value of the appeal is Rs. 10,049. 38 ps.
( 2 ) THE present appellant is the Dy. Director of Agriculture, Khammam. He filed an application before the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act for payment of a sum of Rs. 10,049-38 ps. awarded towards compensation for acquisition of certain lands. According to him the lands belong to the third claimant therein who had misappropriated a sum of Rs. 4,00,000. 00 and odd while he was in service and hence in recovery of the said amount that is appropriated he is entitled for the same. The case of the first claimant was that the lands, which were acquired and in respect of which compensation was determined by the Collector under S. 11 do not belong to the third claimant, but belong to him. As a result of the dispute with regard to the apportionment of the amount on the basis of the title of the property, the Land Acquisition Officer made a reference to the Court under S. 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. On such reference the matter w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.