SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(AP) 274

A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Deputy Director of Agriculture, Khamman – Appellant
Versus
Sarvadevabhatla Ramanadham – Respondent


AMARESWARI RAMANUJULU NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) IN these S. R. Nos. , the question that falls for consideration is whether the appeal preferred by the appellants under S. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act is maintainable. The value of the appeal is Rs. 10,049. 38 ps.

( 2 ) THE present appellant is the Dy. Director of Agriculture, Khammam. He filed an application before the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act for payment of a sum of Rs. 10,049-38 ps. awarded towards compensation for acquisition of certain lands. According to him the lands belong to the third claimant therein who had misappropriated a sum of Rs. 4,00,000. 00 and odd while he was in service and hence in recovery of the said amount that is appropriated he is entitled for the same. The case of the first claimant was that the lands, which were acquired and in respect of which compensation was determined by the Collector under S. 11 do not belong to the third claimant, but belong to him. As a result of the dispute with regard to the apportionment of the amount on the basis of the title of the property, the Land Acquisition Officer made a reference to the Court under S. 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. On such reference the matter w















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top