SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 201

K.C.BHANU
RATNA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
HEMENDRA MANUBHAI CHOWKSI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.K.SURI, T.Nagarjuna Reddy

( 1 ) CHALLENGING the judgment of acquittal dated 18-07-2002 passed in C. C. No. 60 of 2001 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of first Class, Special Mobile Court, Srikakulam whereunderthe first respondent/accused was acquitted of the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881, the present Criminal Appeal is preferred under Section 378 (4) Cr. P. C. by the appellant/complainant.

( 2 ) THE case of the complainant, in brief, may be stated as follows: the accused is a civil and mechanical contractor and he is managing partner of m/s. Jaimenee Engineers. In pursuanceof an oral agreement entered into by the accused with thecomplainantforsupplying construction building material at Nalco, Damanjodi, the complainant supplied 40 and 20 mm chips, boulders and bricks and raised bill for rs. 11,08,110/- and the same was passed by one S. P. Patnaik, site in-charge. The accused gave a cheque bearing no. 782768 dated 22-11 -1999 for Rs. 10,50,000/- of State Bank of India, Damanjodi branch and the same was presented on 14-12-1999, but it was returned with endorsement 'payment stopped by the drawer'. The complainant got issued the statutory notice on 22-12-19














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top