1. On 26-10-2007, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies had taken notice and requested time to get instructions. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies had placed the instructions before this court and submitted that the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur, had issued notices on 12.08.2005, 03.09.2005 for hearing the case on 03.09.2005 and 19.09.2005. After considering the explanation of the dealer and also after giving an opportunity of personal hearing on 03.09.2005 and finally on 17.10.2005, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur, has cancelled her dealership vide D.Dis.No.DICS/1018/2005, dated 22-10-2005.

2. The main grievance of the writ petitioner is that the order of cancellation made is not preceded by a show cause notice calling upon the writ petitioner to explain why the cancellation should not be effected. The learned counsel would contend that the show cause notice was issued calling upon the petitioner to explain why her authorization not to be suspended and in the light of the same, the impugned proceeding is bad in law. The learned counsel placed strong reliance on the decision of this court in M.Vijya L