Respondents 1 to 17 herein (for short ‘the respondents’) filed O.S.No.354 of 2009 in the Court of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against respondents 18 to 70 and the petitioners herein (defendants 3 and 27), for the relief of declaration to the effect that they are the owners and possessors of Acs.7.28 guntas of land, in Sy.No.129/52, and for perpetual injunction. The petitioners filed I.A.No.2461 and 2462 of 2009, individually, with a prayer to reject the plaint under Rule 11 of Order VII C.P.C. Through separate, but similar orders, the trial Court dismissed the same. Hence, these revisions, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners contend that the respondents have been litigating for the suit schedule property in one form or the other for the past several decades, and that even after they lost in every forum, they filed the present suit to open another round of vexatious litigation. It is also their case that the suit is barred by res judicata, and by limitation. They contend that the trial Court did not appreciate the matter from the correct perspective and that the plaint is liable to be rejected. Reference is made to vari