SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 573

R.KANTHA RAO
Avula Jayarami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Yerrabothula Nagarathnamma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:C. Sadasiva Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None appeared.

Judgment :

1. This second appeal is filed against the decree and judgment dated 14.10.2003 passed by the II Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur in A.S.No.22 of 2002 reversing the decree and judgment dated 01.05.1999 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Jammalamadugu in O.S.No.267 of 1997.

2. I have heard Sri C. Sadasiva Reddy, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant/defendant. Though served with notice, none appeared for the respondent.

3. The respondent is the natural daughter of the appellant-Avula Jayarami Reddy. The parents of the respondent gave her in adoption to A.Lakshmi Reddy and his wife on 14.02.1985. Both the Courts below on facts and evidence held that the adoption is valid. The Hindu Succession (A.P. Amendment) Act, 1986, Act 13 of 1986 came into force in the State of A.P. w.e.f 05.09.1985. As per the said Act, a daughter is considered to be coparcener and she can claim share in the joint family property by virtue of Section 29-A of Hindu Succession Act, 1986 provided she was married prior to 06.06.1996 and the joint family properties were not partitioned on the said date. In the instant case, the learned trial Court took the view that as per the evide





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top