V.V.S.RAO, K.G.SHANKAR
Arrack Bottling Unit – Appellant
Versus
The Hon’ble Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal – Respondent
V.V.S. RAO, J.
These writ appeals by the Arrack Bottling Unit (hereafter called, ABU), IML Depot, are against the common judgment of the learned single Judge dated 02.12.2010 in W.P.No.24606 of 2000 and fourteen other writ petitions. W.A.No.638 of 2011, however, is filed against the order of the Hon’ble Chief Justice disposing of petitioners’ writ petition following the decision in W.P.No.24606 of 2000. As the issue is common in all the matters and they arise out of a common order passed by the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Warangal, it is necessary to dispose of the matters by a common order.
2. The second respondent herein, who is a workman, and twenty other workmen raised industrial dispute under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. They prayed for a declaration that the action of the respondents therein in terminating their services is null and void and for a direction to reinstate the workmen on daily wages with continuance of service, but without backwages. The Tribunal declared that the termination of workmen on 29.11.1989 amounting to retrenchment is illegal, null and void. Aggrieved by those awards where reinstatement was ordered, the resp
Harjinder Singh v. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation: 2010 (2) SCJ 712. (Para 10)
State of Mysore v. Workers of Gold Mines: AIR 1958 SC 923. (Para 10)
Ramon Services (Private) Limited v. Subhash Kapoor: (2001) 1 SCC 118. (Para 10)
Syed Yakoob v. K.S.Radhakrishnan: AIR 1964 SC 477. (Para 11)
CLT. v. Karam Chand Thapar & Brothers: (1989) 2 SCC 31 = AIR 1989 SC 1045.
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai: 2003 (5) ALT 19 (SC). (Para 16)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.