SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 546

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
P. Padmanabhaiah – Appellant
Versus
G. Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This is a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the respondent-plaintiff assailing the order dated 25.02.2016 of the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool, passed in IA. No. 1174 of 2015 in OS. No. 324 of 2010 filed by the petitioner-defendant under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, requesting to send the vakalat and written statement containing his signatures along with the promissory note, exhibit A1, with endorsement thereon, exhibit A2, to a handwriting expert for comparison of the signatures of the defendant on vakalat and written statement on one hand with the signatures said to be of him on exhibits A1 and A2 and furnishing a report with opinion as to the genuineness or otherwise of the disputed signatures on exhibits A1 and A2.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner-plaintiff. Though the respondent-defendant is served with notice, none appears. I have perused the material record.

3. The facts as borne out by record and as per the submissions made before this Court, in brief, are as follows:

The plaintiff brought the suit against the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top