1. These revisions arise out of the dismissal of two applications filed by the petitioner/ defendant, seeking the reopening of his evidence and also for sending the suit promissory note Ex.A.1 for examination to a Handwriting Expert.

2. Heard Mr. A. Bhaskara Chari, learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant and Mr. V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.

3. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S. No. 1263 of 2015 against the petitioner herein, for recovery of money on the basis of a promissory note dated 08.12.2012. The petitioner herein filed a written statement contending, inter alia, that he borrowed an amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- from a person by name Raghava Arjuna Rao on 13.08.2010 and also created a mortgage in his favour; that at the time of borrowal, the said Ragha Arjuna Rao took his signatures in a blank promissory note and a blank cheque; that though the entire mortgage debt was discharged by him, the said Raghava Arjuna Rao filed a suit in O.S. No. 63 of 2013; that the petitioner never borrowed any money from the respondent herein and that with the assistance of the said Raghava Arjuna Rao, the respondent fabricated the blank promissory