M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
N. Prateep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M. Jagadeesh Chandra Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal was preferred under Section 19 (1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 before the Division Bench to set aside the order dated 21.10.2021, finding appellant guilty for contempt of C.C.No.722 of 2021.
2. Learned single Judge held as follows:
5. In view of this clear contempt, the respondent is sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of four weeks and a fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) payable within two weeks from the date of this order. Failing which, the respondent shall be liable for further simple imprisonment of two weeks.
6. This order is suspended for a period of four weeks to enable the respondent to file an appeal against this order if he so chooses."
3. Aggrieved by the above order, the appellant herein preferred the appeal raising several contentions.
4. Upon hearing argument of both the counsel, the presiding brother Judge (Justice
Sita Ram Bhau Patil vs. Ramachandra Nago Patil
Nagubai Ammal and others vs. B. Shama Rao
Union of India (UOI) vs. Ibrahim Uddin (2012) 8 SCC 148
Supreme Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (1998) 4 SCC 409
Pallav Sheth vs. Custodian (2001) 7 SCC 549
Bal Kishan Giri vs. State of U.P. (2014) 7 SCC 280
Vishram Singh Raghubanshi vs. State of U.P. AIR 2011 SC 2275
Kanwar Singh Saini vs. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307
Mrityunjoy Das vs. Sayed Hasibur Rahaman (2001) 3 SCC 739
U.N.Bora vs. Assam Roller Flour Mills Assn (2022) 1 SCC 101
Debabrata Bandopadbyay vs. State of West Bengal
State of U.P. vs. Krishna Gopal
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Dharkole @ Govind Singh [2004] 13 SCC 308
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.