SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 926

SECRETARY – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF SECRETARY – Respondent


( 1 ) PETITIONER is an association claiming to have been formed by the technical employees of the Seri-Culture Department, Government of Karnataka. It is the claim of the petitioner that this association had been granted recognition by the Government as per its proceedings dated 6. 12. 1999 (copy at Annexure E) subject to imposing as many as 21 conditions. Petitioner claims that the Association is functioning within the parameters indicated by Government Order dated 6. 12. 1999 and has memberships of more than 5500 employees of the Seri-Culture Department.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is now aggrieved by the subsequent Government Order dated 6. 3. 2000 (copy at Annexure F) whereby the Government has cancelled the recognition that had been accorded in favour of the petitioner association as per its earlier order dated 6. 12. 1999. with immediate effect. It is such cancellation of recognition to the petitioner association which has given cause to the petitioner to approach this Court praying for quashing of this notification under Annexure F and for such other direction to be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.

( 3 ) SRI Gopi Prakash, learned Counsel for










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top