SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Kar) 204

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
A. K. SUBBIAH – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, BANGALORE – Respondent


( 1 ) ESPOUSING the cause of the general public, two members of the State Legislature have filed this petition alleging that respondent 2 who is a member of the State Legislative Council had on the floor of that House made certain derogatory remarks touching the conduct of the Judges of this Court in violation of Article 211 of the Constitution and requesting this Court to issue a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution,- (i) directing respondent 1 the Chairman of the Legislative council to produce the records of the proceedings of the Karnataka State Legislate Council dated 11-8-1978 relating to the statements made by the second respondent as stated in the annexure marked Ext. 'a' and (ii) quashing the entire proceedings therein by declaring the said proceedings to be unconstitutional and illegal as violating the provisions of Art. 211 of the constitution of India.

( 2 ) THIS case involves great constitutional principles touching parliamentary democracy and independence of the judiciary and hence requires a cautious approach. An independent judiciary, according to Sri S. R. Das Gupta, an illustrious Chief Justice of this Court, is a judiciary which consists of Judges who are i










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top