SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Kar) 169

V.S.MALIMATH
M. NANJAPPA – Appellant
Versus
M. P. MUTHUSWAMY – Respondent


M. NANJAPPA VS. M. P. MUTHUSWAMY

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is by the defendant against the decree passed by the Principal District judge, Bangalore, in Regular Appeal No. 25 of 1966 modifying the decree passed by the principal Civil Judge, Bangalore (Urban), in Original Suit No. 83 of 1964. The plaintiff has also preferred cross-objections.

( 2 ) THE respondent Muthuswamy was employed by the appellant Nanjappa as a salesman under the contract Ex. D-1 dated 2nd January, 1962. The contractual period stipulated therein is five years. The salary fixed was Rs. 120 per month and Muthuswamy was entitled to annual increments at the rate of Rs. 10. The contract also provides that in the event of Muthuswamy deciding to start his own business, he is free to quit the job on the completion of three years of service. On the same day another contract came into existence between the parties under which nanjappa agreed to pay a further sum of Rs. 80 per month if Muthuswamy secured good business from places outside the city of Bangalore. It is not disputed that no occasion arose for payment of the additional amount as ,per the contract Ex. P-3. Muthuswamy was employed as a salesman in the employer's



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top