A.S.BOPANNA
JAYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964, Section 107Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966, Rules 50, 51, 52 and 53 - Petitioner sought survey of land in view of dispute relating to extent of land - Tahsildar issued endorsement that survey cannot be conducted in view of pendency of suit in Court Aggrieved petitioner filed writ petition seeking mandamus to direct surveyor to survey land - Survey authorities contended that survey could not be conducted due to non-eo-operation of villagers and also pendency of law suit Held - Suit to which reference is made has nothing to do with surveyor in carrying out his legal obligation - Not taken any steps to carry out survey - Surveyor directed to carry out survey - Directed to issue notice to all parties -If any dispute arises, procedure contemplated in law shall be followed.
A.S. Bopanna, J., Held: A perusal of suit plaint would indicate that the petitioner is not a party to the said suit. The suit in question is an inter se partition suit between the family members. . . . . . The suit to which reference has been made in the endorsement impugned in the petition has nothing to do with the surveyor in carrying out his legal obligation. Therefore t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.