SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Kar) 214

B.VENKATASWAMI, G.K.GOVINDA BHAT
Mushtaque and Co. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. H.L. Narasimhasastri, for the Appellant
Mr. S.R. Rajashekhara Murthy, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The assessee in this case, M/s. Mushtaque and Company. Davangere, had been refused registration under section 185(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the element of agency which is an essential ingredient to constitute a valid partnership was absent in this case. The assessment year involved is 1962-62. The corresponding accounting period was the year ended March 31, 1962. The instrument of partnership produced before the authorities was dated March 30, 1962, and the partnership was deemed to have come into operation with effect from April 1, 1961. The Constitution of the partnership in terms of the aforesaid deed was as under :


1. Sri C. R. Sayyad Hafeez Saheb,

managing partner 1/2 share.

2. Sri Abdul Warris Saheb, 1/6th share from 1-4-61 to

10-6-61;

1/4 share from 11-6-61 to

31-1-62;

1/6th share from 1-2-62.

3. Sri Sayyad Abdulla Saheb, 1/6th share from 1-4-61 to

10-6-61;

1/4th share from 11-6-61 to

31-1-62;

1/6th share from 1-2-62.

4. Smt. Fatimbhai (died on 10-6-61) From 1-4-61 to 10-6




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top