SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 300

SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Malati Madhav Potbbare – Appellant
Versus
Madhav Gopal PotbhaRe and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Mrs Manohar. Sujata J.-The petitioner had presented a petition in forma pauper is under Order 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, on 3rd November, 1982. By this petition she had asked for permission to institute a suit as an indigent person and had asked for declarations relating to, a property known as 'Potbhare Building' and for further monetary reliefs against the respondents as set out in the petition. After the petition was filed, under the provisions of Order 33, rule 1A read with rules 212 and 213 of the High Court Rules on the original side an investigation into pauperium was started before the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court in order to decide whether permission should be granted to the petitioner to institute a suit in Forma Pauperis. For this purpose some meetings were held before the Prothono-tary and Senior Master and on a number of occasions investigation was-adjourned. Before the investigation could be completed the parties settled the matter and the petitioner through her advocate applied for permission to withdraw the petition. Accordingly on 27th September 1983 the petition has been allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner.

2. The only





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top