SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 522

S.S.DANI, N.P.CHAPALGAONKER
Mohd. Mustaq Ahemad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - CHAPALGAONKER N.P., J.:— These two petitions raise identical question and, therefore, are taken together. Writ Petition No. 5566 of 1995 challenges a Notification issued by the Revenue and Forest Department of the State of Maharashtra on 9-11-1995 publishing a draft notification intimating the intension of the State Government to rename Aurangabad Revenue Division as Marathwada Division, Aurangabad District as Sambhajinagar district and Aurangabad Sub-Division as Sambhajinagar Sub-Division, Aurangabad taluka as Sambhajinagar Taluka and Aurangabad city as Sambhajinagar City. By this Notification, objections, if any, were called from all persons likely to be affected, to be submitted with the Government on or before 8-12-1995 by which the Government proposed to consider the draft notification anytime thereafter. Writ Petition No. 5565 of 1995 challenges Notification of 9-11-1995 by which the Government proposed to alter the name of the city of Aurangabad to city of Sambhajinagar and consequentially proposed to amend Government Notification dated 3-12-1982 by substituting word 'the city of Sambhajinagar' for the words 'the city of Aurangabad'. This notification called for o

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top