SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 662

B.B.VAGYANI
Chandrakant Ganpat Sovitkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.B. VAGYANI, J.:---Heard Shri M.S. Phatak, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.B. Gaikwad, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has filed this criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashment of the order of attachment of movable and immovable property passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad.

3. The petitioner was a Police Officer. He is permanent resident of Kallamnuri, District Parbhani. In 1956, he was selected as P.S.I. He completed his training in the year 1956-57 at Hyderabad and Nasik. He owned 17 acres of land at Shivani and 4 acres of land at Dhanora, Tq. Kallamnuri, District Parbhani. The petitioner has already sold land to the extent of 4 acres situated at Dhanora in the year 1960 for Rs. 1500/-. He has also sold two houses for Rs. 47,000/- in the year 1984 and 1986 respectively. The petitioner was the only earning member in the family. He had no source of income other than salary and income from landed property. The petitioner has constructed two houses in the year 1976 and 1986 at Nanded and Cidco, Aurangabad respectively. The value of the house s
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top