SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 949

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, F.I.REBELLO
LAYA BINAY KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

F. I. REBELLO, J. : - All these petitions are being disposed of by a common order as the issue involved is the same. The petitioners are prosecuting their M.B.B.S. Course in colleges affiliated to the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (hereinafter referred to as University), having been admitted to a medical course. It is the case of the petitioners that they have passed their first and second M.B.B.S. examinations. They have also passed third M.B.B.S. (Part I) examination. They appeared for third M.B.B.S. (Part II) examinations conducted by the University in December, 2005, the results of which were declared on 18 -2 -2006. In the result declared, some petitioners were declared to have failed in the subject "General Surgery" and some petitioners in the subject "General Medicine". The mark -sheets were displayed on the website of the University and the copies of the same were also provided to the students. It is the case of the petitioners that on perusal of the mark sheets, it would reveal that the petitioners had either failed in the practical paper of the subject "General. Surgery" and or "General Medicine" and as such had been declared to have failed i



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top