SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Bom) 240

PENDSE
Pitambardas Kalyanji Bakotiya – Appellant
Versus
Dattatraya Krishnaji – Respondent


Advocates:
K.J. Abhyankar with N.D. Gangakhedkar and Ajit P. Shah, for Petitioner; A.C. Agarwal with Smt. Anita A. Agarwal, for Respondent.

ORDER :- By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-tenant is challenging the legality of the judgment dated June 29, 1976 passed by the Joint Judge, Poona, confirming the decree of eviction dated Jan. 30, 1974 passed by the Additional Judge of the Small Causes Court at Poona.

2. The respondent is the owner of House No. 768, Budhwar Peth. Poona, and the residential premises on the second floor of this house are let out to the petitioner. The landlord is in occupation of the first floor, just below the premises occupied by the petitioner. The landlord instituted suit for recovery of possession on Nov. 13, 1972 in the Court of Small Causes at Poona under S.13 (1) (a) and (b) of the Bombay Rents. Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The gravamen of the allegation made by the landlord is that the petitioner has constructed a kitchen platform in the premises let out to him without prior permission of the respondent, given in writing, and such construction has resulted into damage or waste to the building. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has constructed a kitchen platform admeasuring 2 ½




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top