SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 2135

A.S.OKA, REVATI MOHITE DERE
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Alpa Rajesh Shah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Devendranath S. Joshi, Advocate.
For the Respondents:T.J. Mendon, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

A.S. Oka, J.

1. By this appeal, the appellant the New India Assurance Company Limited has taken an exception to the Judgment and Award dated 23rd September 2011 passed by the learned Chairman of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in a claim petition filed by the respondents under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the said Act”). The claim for compensation was made on account of death of one Rajesh Shah in a vehicular accident on 18th February 1989. The first respondent is the widow of the deceased Rajesh. The second respondent is the minor son of the deceased Rajesh and the third respondent is the mother of the deceased Rajesh. To the original claim petition, even the father of the deceased Rajesh was made a party who died during the pendency of the claim petition. Thereafter, his name has been deleted.

2. The case made out in the claim petition was that on 18th February 1999, the deceased Rajesh was proceeding by a car on Mumbai Pune highway. The accident occurred at about 9.00 p.m close to Balewadi stadium near Pune. At that time, a motor tanker came from the opposite direction. The motor tanker was admittedly owned by the fourth responden




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top