R.D.DHANUKA
Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Cool Breeze Co-operative Housing Society Limited – Respondent
1. By this Petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Petitioner seeks an injunction restraining the Respondent No.1 from appointing any other builder/Developer to re-develop the property described in prayer (a) of the petition.
Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under:
2. The respondent no.1 is a Co-operative Housing Society. The Respondent Nos. 2 to 33 are members of the respondent No.1 society. Respondent nos. 34 is impleaded as party-respondent pursuant to an order dated 9.7.2013 passed by this Court.
3. The respondent no.1 society wanted to re-develop the property described in prayer clause (a) of the Petition. The respondent No.1 is a lessee of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board (MHADA) in respect of the said property. On 12.7.2012 the petitioner submitted a proposal to the first respondent in respect of re-development of the said property.
4. On 16.7.2012 the respondent No.1 passed a resolution to cancel the then existing agreement between Shikara Constructions Pvt. Ltd. The respondent No.1 resolved to appoint the Petitioner as a Devel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.