IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S. PATEL, J.
Faber-Castell Aktiengesellschaft - Plaintiffs
Versus
Cello Pens Pvt. Ltd. - Defendants
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 1824 OF 2015
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 696 OF 2015
Decided On : 3.9.2015
Design Infringement - Crayon - Design Act, 2000, Section 2(d), Section 22 - The court discussed the unique and novel shape of the crayons, the manner in which they were presented in a tray, and the elements of the packaging. The court highlighted the interpretation of 'capricious' in design law and emphasized the importance of aesthetic and novel design. The judgment also discussed the legal principles related to passing off and the criteria for granting an injunction.
Fact of the Case:
The Plaintiffs, Faber-Castell AKG and A. W. Faber-Castell (I) Pvt Ltd, alleged that the Defendant, Cello Pens Pvt Ltd, had copied every aspect of their crayon product, leading to design and copyright infringement and passing off.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that Cello's product bore an unholy resemblance to Faber-Castell's product, leading to passing off. The court also rejected the Defendant's defense of prior publication and emphasized the unique and artistic elements of Faber-Castell's product.
Issues: The issues included design and copyright infringement, passing off, prior publication, and the distinction between purely functional and aesthetic elements in design.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of aesthetic and novel design in the context of design law. It also highlighted the criteria for granting an injunction in cases of passing off.
Final Decision: The court granted an injunction restraining the Defendant from using the impugned product and design, rejecting the application for a stay.
1. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant. The 2nd Defendant, ebay India Pvt. Ltd, was directed to be deleted by a separate order are fighting over crayons.
2. According to the Plaintiffs, Faber-Castell AKG and A. W. Faber-Castell (I) Pvt Ltd (together, “Faber-Castell”; separately “Faber-Castell AKG” and “Faber-Castell India”, respectively), The 2nd Plaintiff is the wholly-owned Indian subsidiary of the 1st Plaintiff they have since 2010 marketed in India through the 2nd Plaintiff a set of 24 crayons in quite luscious colours, of a distinctive type and in unique packaging. Faber-Castell says that the Defendant, Cello Pens Pvt Ltd (“Cello”), has not merely copied every single aspect of the Faber-Castell product “down to the last millimetre”, as Mr. Dhond who appears for them puts it, but have infringed Faber- Castell’s design. The cause of action in the suit is in design and copyright infringement combined with a cause of action in passing off.
3. The Notice of Motion was first moved quite recently, on 9th July 2015. Since then a very large number of Affidavits have come to be filed. The paper-book in the Notice of Motion alone is now over 647 pages and has gone to the stage of a Sur-Sur-Sur- Rejoinder. Despite this volume and bulk, the issue is narrow, especially because Mr. Dhond limits his application at the final hearing of this Notice of Motion to his cause of action in passing off. The rest, as he quite correctly says, can await the trial.
4. Mr. Dhond places his case thus: First, the Plaintiffs’ product has a unique and novel shape. By this he means the triangular or three-sided shape of the 24 crayons in the package, as also the presence on all three faces of the crayon’s shank of two parallel lines of tiny protuberances or raised dots. Whether these are purely functional to provide a better grip as Mr. Kane for Cello claims, or whether these dots are what is described in this branch of the law as ‘capricious’ is a matter to which I will turn shortly. The second aspect to Mr. Dhond’s argument is the manner in which the crayons are presented in a tray, i.e., in two subsidiary recessed trays facing each other and set in a larger outer container. Given that the crayons all also have sharpened points — and the fact that they are sharpenable and erasable is also said to be distinctive — when placed like thus, these crayons look nothing so much as vibrantly coloured missiles in antipodal silos: one battery of these crayonmissles faces the other across the demilitarized zone of shallower recesses (ditches, in our martial analogy) that hold, predictably, a benign eraser and a useful sharpener. The larger container tray, in stealthy black plastic, slides out of a colourful carton, one that is predominantly red. The carton itself has two fenestellae through which the inner contents are partially visible. There are, in addition, certain elements to the packaging itself, i.e., its predominantly red colour scheme, the scattering of logos and icons on the package, and so on. My military parallels notwithstanding, this is a bright and cheerful package such as would certainly entice and excite a young child: the packaging is vivid and eye-catching, and the crayons are — there is no other word for this — gorgeous. They have a sheen to them that other rival products lack. At a single glance, they evoke even in the adult mind memories of a simpler, kinder, less complicated time.
5. The outer packaging is, however, by now of little consequence since Mr. Kane states that Cello’s outer packaging has been withdrawn from the market and an entirely new and dissimilar packaging has been, or is about to be, introduced. The annexure to this order, provided by Mr. Dhond, has representations of the competing products in a tabulated comparison.
6. Faber-Castell AKG is a very old company. It was established in 1761. It is widely renowned for its range of quality writing products and instruments: pencils, both normal and mechanical or automatic, coloure
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.