SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 2176

SADHANA S.JADHAV
Sakharam – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : A.S. Deshmukh, Adv.
For the Respondents: U.S. Mote, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.

1. The applicant herein is convicted by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani in R.C.C. No. 36 of 1993 for the offence punishable under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default, further rigorous imprisonment for six months. The applicant herein being aggrieved by the said judgment and order filed Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2002 before the Sessions Court at Parbhani. Learned Sessions Court vide judgment and order dated 02.01.2003 had maintained the order of conviction. However, had modified the sentence and directed the applicant to undergo substantive sentence for six months and fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default, simple imprisonment for one month. Hence, this Revision Application. Such of the facts necessary for the decision of this application are as follows:-

2. The applicant herein was working as a Range Forest Officer at Basmat in the year 1991. The applicant was entrusted with the cheque worth of Rs. 35,000/- dated 05.08.1991, cheque worth of Rs. 53,646/- dated 09.08.1991 and cheque worth of Rs. 8,000/- dated 10.08.1991. The office had not received stat





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top