SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.P.CHINNAPPA
H. M. Revanna – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

M.P. Chinnappa, J- The petitioner herein has questioned the proceedings in S.C. No. 63/90 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural Distt for the offences under Sections143,147,148,341,342,353,506, 307 and 427 IPC in so far as it relates to "the petitioner.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Circle Inspector of Police, Magadi Police Station submitted charge sheet against the accused for the offences punishable under sections referred to above in C.C. No. 224/1985 on the file of the J.M.F.C at Magadi. The learned Magistrate passed an order on 4-8-1990 under Section 209 committing the entire case to the Court of Sessions on the ground that offence under Section 307 is exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, as against the A-1 to A-106 as per the separate list enclosed to the order. This order is questioned by the petitioner here in. Though petitioner has raised several contentions in this petition at the time of the arguments it is restricted to only one question as to whether the committal order passed under Section 209 is valid or not.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that from the perusal of the order it is clear that only accused

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top