SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.T.THOMAS, S.N.VARIAVA
Mungeshwar Prasad Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Three persons were convicted under sections 304(B), 201 read with sections 34 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The present appellants were sentenced to RI for seven years each for the first count and RI for two years on the section court while no separate sentence was awarded for the third count. As for the remaining convicted person, the sentence awarded on the first count was RI for nine years (Ram Pukar). All the convicted persons appealed before the High Court and the conviction as well as sentence were confirmed. The present appellants are A1 - Mungeshwar Prasad and A3 - Devanti Devi. Their son Ram Pukar is the remaining convicted person who has not challenged the verdict of the High Court. So, we are dealing with this appeal only in respect of the present appellants before us.

3. Sudama Devi was married to the son of the appellants - Ram Pukar, some time during 1992. She died of unnatural circumstances on 24.1.95. The convicted persons are alleged to have subjected her to harassments with the demand for dowry and after her death, she was hurriedly cremated. The trial court convicted the three accused in the aforesaid background.

4. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top