SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 158

KISHORE KUMAR PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Hakim Rahman Bux – Appellant
Versus
Muhammad Mahmood Hassan – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal has been on behalf of the plaintiff Hakim Rahman Bux, against the decision of the first Additional Subordinate Judge of Bhagalpur dated the 7th February, 1949 reversing a decision of the Munisif, 1st Court, Bhagalpur, dated the 31st May, 1948.

2. The question debated in this appeal is whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred under Article 132 of the Limitation Act or whether Sec.20 of the Limitation Act applies and a fresh period of limitation should be computed from the date of payment made by defendant No. 1, Muhammad Mahmood Hassan one of the sons of Mahboob Ali, who had borrowed the money from the plaintiff on the basis of the mortgage bond dated the 25th of February, 1923.

It appears that Mahboob Ali died and was succeeded by his heirs, namely, his widow, defendant No. 4 who had an interest to the extent of 4 annas, three sons, who had each ah Interest of 3 annas 6 pies, and all his daughters, who had an interest to the extent of 1 anna 9 pies each. It has been found by the lower court that defendant No. 1. had made part payments from the 13th of March, 1925, to the 20th of October, 1940, the total amount being Rs. 2000/-. It has also been found by th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top