SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Pat) 103

RAMRATNA SINGH, KANHAIYA SINGH
Ram Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shivanandan Misra – Respondent


Judgment

Kanhaiya Singh, J.

1. This appeal by the plaintiff arises out of a suit for declaration. The facts found by the courts below, which are no longer in dispute, are these :

2. Defendants 1 and 2 owned and ran in partnership a hotel called New Milan Hotel in mohalla Muradpur holding half share each. The rent of the house, in which the hotel was located having fallen in arrears, the landlord instituted a proceeding for their eviction on the ground of non-payment of rent. During the pendency of the proceedings, the plaintiff purchased the half share of defendant Mo, 2 in the said hotel by a registered deed of sale dated the 6th April, 1950. On 15th September, 1950, the plaintiff paid Rs. 975/- to the landlord as rent from September, 1949 to the date of the payment and in consequence whereof the proceedings for eviction were dropped. The plaintiff further paid rent from his own pocket from September, 1950 to January, 1951 at the rate of Rs. 75/- per month. He further paid Rs. 200/4/-on account of electric charges from January, 1950 to January, 1951. The plaintiff thereafter brought the present suit on 20th February, 1951, claiming contribution from the defendants on the ground tha





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top