SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Pat) 451

B.C.BASAK, N.PANDEY, G.C.BHARUKA
Shambhu Saran – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B.C.Basak, N.Pandey and G.C.Bharuka JJ.

1. In this case a short point has been referred for decision to a larger Bench by a Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 20th of August, 1991. This reference is occasioned by an earlier Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Singheshwari Sahay V/s. The State of Bihar and others reported in 1979 B.B.C.J. 735. The previous Division Bench decided that in a case where a Departmental Proceeding was started against the petitioner when he was in service, if before such deartmental proceeding came to an end, the petitioner has superannuated, in that case without any specific order of the Government, the departmental proceeding could not be continued. It was further held by the earlier Division Bench that since in the facts of that case it has not so ordered to be continued, after the superannuation of the petitioner,- it will be deemed to have been dropped against him. The subsequent Division Bench differed from the same and referred this matter to a larger Bench. This has now come up before us on this short point alone and we are not concerned with any other point at this stage.

2. Before we deal with such contention






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top