SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 678

SYED MD.MAHFOOZ ALAM, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Raju Manjhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S. M. M. Alam, J.

1. All the three Cr. Appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 21st August, 2001 passed by Sri S. C. Pandey, 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, in Sessions Trial No.341 of 1999/322 of 1999 whereby he has been pleased to convict all the above noted five appellants under Sec.396 of the Indian Penal code (hereinafter will be called an IPC ). He has further been pleased to convict appellants Chun Chun Manjhi, Munna manjhi, Anil Rajak and Raju Manjhi under Sec.412 of the IPC also. After convicting all the appellants, he passed order of sentence only under Sec.396 of the IPC and directed all the appellants to undergo RI for life under the said section with fine of rupees one thousand each and in default thereof to undergo further RI for a period of six months. He has not imposed separate sentence under Sec.412 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The prosecution case as per the fardbeyan of PW 3 Kamdeo Singh son of saho Singh of village Bangareya P. S. Hulasganj, Dist. Jahanabad residing at mohalla Lakhibag, P. S. Muffasil, Dist. Gaya recorded by S. I. Md. Jameel Akhter, officer-in-Charge, of Muffasil P. S. on 12.1.1999 at 2.00 a.


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top