IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI, J.
Kedar Nath Pandey & Ors.– Petitioners
Versus
The Magadh University, Bodhgaya Through Its Registrar & Ors.- Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7636 of 2014
Decided on : 15-01-2015
Pay Verification Cell - Absorption of Service - Bihar Universities Act - Section 4(1)(14), Section 35, Section 54, Section 57-A - The court discussed the unilateral decision of the Pay Verification Cell and its effect on the absorption of service, pay fixation, and promotion of the petitioners. It highlighted the provisions of the Bihar Universities Act, including Section 4(1)(14), Section 35, Section 54, and Section 57-A, and their interpretations in the context of the court's decision. The court emphasized that the objection of the Pay Verification Cell cannot annul previous notifications issued by the University and that the final decision rests with the University.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, Readers in different Colleges under Magadh University, challenged the unilateral decision of the Pay Verification Cell, which affected their absorption in service, pay fixation, and promotion. The dispute arose from the absorption of employees of constituent Colleges under Magadh University and the subsequent decision of the Pay Verification Cell.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the decision of the Pay Verification Cell was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice and quashed the decision contained in Annexure- 8 series. It directed the concerned respondents to act in accordance with the law and the statute.
Issues: The issues revolved around the unilateral decision of the Pay Verification Cell, the validity of the constitution of the Cell, the absorption of service of the petitioners, and the financial control of the State Government over the Universities.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the objection of the Pay Verification Cell cannot annul previous notifications issued by the University and that the final decision rests with the University. It also highlighted the principles of natural justice and the financial control of the State Government over the Universities.
Final Decision: The court quashed the decision contained in Annexure- 8 series and allowed the writ application with liberty to the concerned respondents to act in accordance with the law and the statute.
The six petitioners, who are all Readers in different Colleges under Magadh University, have been hit by a unilateral decision taken by the Pay Verification Cell constituted by the Education Department, Government of Bihar in terms of Annexure- 8 series. The impugned decision has the effect of shifting the date of their absorption in service after many many years. This will not only affect their pay fixation etc. but will also have the effect of taking away the benefit of promotion granted on the basis of the earlier date of absorption in service. The decision contained in Annexure- 8 series according to the petitioners are unilateral without any opportunity of hearing or notice as well as being beyond powers of the Pay Verification Cell and in total derogation of the provisions of the Bihar Universities Act.
2. Interlocutory Application has been filed subsequently, which was numbered as 8646 of 2014. This IA also challenges the constitution and validity of the Pay Verification Cell constituted by the State Government on many a grounds including the fact whether the same are in the teeth of Section 4 (1)(14) of the Bihar Universities Act. The above IA is allowed.
3. The common plea taken in the writ application is that between the year 1980 and 1984 petitioners were appointed as Lecturers in different subjects in three different affiliated Colleges under the Magadh University. The details of their appointment and engagement have been provided in paragraph 4 of the writ application. In support thereof the appointment letters have also been annexed as Annexures 1 and 2 series.
4. The Colleges in which these petitioners worked came to be taken over by the State and under the 4th Phase and became constituent Colleges under Magadh University. There were large scale controversies in matter of such take over and the status of the teachers and employees of the 4th Phase taken over colleges. The dispute travelled right uptill the Hon’ble Apex Court. The Hon’ble Apex Courts set up a Commission under Hon’ble Mr Justice S.C.Agrawal (Retd.). After detailed deliberations and hearing, Hon’ble Justice Agrawal submitted his report before the Hon’ble Apex Court on 19.12.2003 and the said report was accepted by the Apex Court vide order dated 12.10.2004. The order of the Hon’ble Apex Court is reported in (2005) 9 SCC 129, which is equivalent to 2005 (1) PLJR 464 (SC).
5. Based on acceptance of Justice Agrawal’s report, the Magadh University issued a notification where the services of altogether 748 employees, relating to 8 Colleges of 4th Phase constituent Colleges, falling under the said University was notified. Details relating to the said notification and the date of absorption are available as Annexure- 3 but the same has been extracted insofar as it relates to these petitioners in paragraph 8 for convenience.
6. It is the stand of the petitioners that the notification issued by the University in terms of Annexure- 3 is in conformity with the recommendation of Justice Agrawal and in support thereof extracts of the recommendation of Justice Agrawal Commission has been annexed as Annexure- 4 series to the writ application. Learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioners submits that a conjoint reading of Annexure- 1, 3 and 4 series makes it absolutely clear that the respondent University has fixed the date of absorption of service of these petitioners strictly in accordance with the eligibility fixed by Hon’ble Justice S.C.Agrawal. Since the report of Justice Agrawal was accepted by the Apex Court in toto, it has the seal of approval by the Apex Court and has become final. If the University authorities in exercise of power under Section 4 (1) (14) of the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 has formalized the said recommendation by issuing a notification, which has taken effect as far back 8th of May, 2005, the same cannot be undone by a non- statutory authority or officials, overriding the above factual and legal position in ga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.