S.B.SINHA, DIBYENDU BHUSAN DUTTA
BAJRANG PRASAD JALAN – Appellant
Versus
MAHABIR PRASAD JALAN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal arose out of interim order dated 6th February, 1997 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court. However, both the parties have prayed before us that the main application itself be disposed of by this bench, pursuant whereto we have heard the parties.
( 2 ) THE order dated 6-2-97 under appeal is in two parts, viz. initiation of a criminal proceeding and interlocutory order issuing certain directions. As the criminal aspect and civil aspect of the matter have nothing to do with each other, intend to pronounce a separate judgment in respect of Criminal aspect of the matter.
( 3 ) FURTHERMORE, the learned counsel for the parties jointly made a prayer that the main petition filed by the Applicants/respondents under the Companies Act be heard by this Bench, pursuant whereto we have heard the parties and in this judgment, dispose of the main application filed by Sri Bajrang Prasad Jalan against the - appellants and other respondents under Sections 155/397/398/399/402/403 and 406 of the Companies Act.
( 4 ) B. P. Jalan for self as Karta of a Hindu undivided family filed an application against 32 persons including Akshay Nidhi Ltd. the respondent No
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka v. Jasjit Singh
M/s. World Wide Agencies Pvt. Ltd. v. Mrs. Margarat T. Desor
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd.
Hind Overseas Private Ltd. v. Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwalla
Parmeshwari Prasad v. Union of India
Stadmed (P.) Ltd. v. K. M. Saha
Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.
Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (I) Holdings Ltd.
Sheth Mohanlal Ganpatram v. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.