SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 237

S.K.Datta
P. K. Roy – Appellant
Versus
Bimala Mukherjee – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N. Lahiri, Manan Kumar Ghosh, R.P. Bagchi

Judgment

1. THE landlord opposite party instituted a suit for recovery of possession of the flat held by the defendant petitioner as a tenant at a monthly rent of Rs. 450/- according to English calendar, on ground of default in payment of rent since March, 1973. The defendant petitioner on entering appearance filed a petition under section 17 (1) of the West Bengal premises Tenancy Act and has been depositing current rent or damages equivalent to rent every month. The petitioner also filed an application under section 17 (2) of the Act raising a dispute as to the amount of rent payable by him in view of the deliberate total stoppage of water in the tenanted premises by the landlord since January, 1973 and prayed for determination of the amount of rent payable by him. By order No. 19 dated May 19, 1975, the learned Munsif rejected the petitioner's prayer for stay of hearing of the petition under section 17 (2) of the act till the decision in the proceeding pending before the Rent Controller for stoppage of water. The court also rejected by order No. 20 of same date the application of the defendant petitioner for adducing evidence in support of his application under section 17 (2) on
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top