SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Cal) 965

BISWANATH SOMADDER, SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Utpal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Akshay Pant – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Surajit Samanta
For the Respondents: K.M.B. Jayapal

JUDGMENT :

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.

1. The present six mandamus appeals are taken up together for hearing in view of those having arisen out of several orders passed by a learned Single Judge in a single writ petition, bearing WP No. 271 of 2016 (Akshay Pant v. Union of India and others).

2. Three of the appeals have been preferred by the Lieutenant Governor, Andaman and Nicobar Islands and the Secretary (Education), Andaman and Nicobar Administration against orders dated August 09, 2018, August 16, 2018 and August 20, 2018. The other three appeals have been preferred by Dr. Utpal Sharma, against the same three orders. Dr. Sharma was the private respondent in the said writ petition.

3. The writ petition was filed in the form of a public interest litigation, seeking a writ of quo warranto. The present respondent No. 1, namely, Akshay Pant, preferred the said writ petition, challenging the appointment and functioning of Dr. Utpal Sharma as the Principal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Pahargaon, Port Blair. As per the respondent No. 1 (the petitioner in the writ petition), Dr. Sharma had produced fake certificates to be appointed to the said post of Principal and had no a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top