VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision is filed against the dismissal of the Appeals by the Additional District Judge, Delhi, in the context of Section 14 (2) of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. Against this Order dated 1. 3. 1999, a Special Leave Petition was filed in the Hon ble Supreme Court which came to be dismissed on 13. 8. 1999. The present Revision was filed on 13. 9. 1999 that is after one month of the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition. Unfortunately, no application seeking condonation of delay/enlargement of time accompanied the Revision Petition. On the objection of the Registry, an Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act dated 12. 11. 1999 was filed on that very day.

( 2 ) IT is trite to state that the application for condonation of delay must accompany the Revision itself. I must, therefore, assume that the Revision was filed not on 13. 9. 1999 but on 12th November, 1999. The Revisionist has invoked Section 5 of the Limitation Act but I shall read into the application the invocation of Section 14 of that Act. I shall also give the benefit of doubt to the Petitioner that the filing of the Special Leave Petition was occasioned by a bona fide error becau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document